The Pirls Is the Main International Test of Reading Given to Students.

The IEA's Progress in International Reading Literacy Report (PIRLS)[1] is an international study of reading (comprehension) achievement in 4th graders. It has been conducted every five years since 2001 by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). It is designed to measure children'southward reading literacy achievement, to provide a baseline for time to come studies of trends in accomplishment, and to gather information about children's home and school experiences in learning to read.[2]

Over 60 countries and sub-national, benchmarking entities participated in PIRLS 2016.[3]

History [edit]

PIRLS[1] provides internationally comparative data on how well children read by assessing students' reading achievement. PIRLS collects considerable background data on how education systems provide educational opportunities to their students as well equally the factors that influence how students employ these opportunities. These background data include information most the post-obit: national curriculum policies in reading; how the pedagogy system is organized to facilitate learning; students' home environment for learning; school climate and resources; and how instruction actually occurs in classrooms. Studies of reading literacy had been conducted prior to the PIRLS study of 2001, and PIRLS is the successor to IEA studies, such as the Reading Literacy Report, that started in 1970 and continued until 1991.[4] The PIRLS study of 2001 started the trend for cyclical testing; PIRLS has a frequency of 5 years. By administering the test every v years, teaching systems are able to monitor their children's literacy achievement over fourth dimension. The electric current bike, PIRLS 2016, is the quaternary cycle of the IEA PIRLS. Like the previous PIRLS cycles (conducted in 2001, 2006, and 2011), the study will also collect extensive data nearly domicile supports for literacy, curriculum and curriculum implementation, instructional practices, and school resource in each participating land.[i]

Cycles [edit]

PIRLS 2021 [edit]

PIRLS 2021 will be the 5th bike in the PIRLS framework. IEA's PIRLS volition continue to collect considerable background data from the assessed students, their parents, teachers and school principals on how education systems provide educational opportunities to their students, as well as the factors that influence how students use these opportunities. Tendency results across assessments allow countries to monitor the effectiveness of their educational systems in a global context, and PIRLS 2021 marks 20 years of trends.

PIRLS 2021 evolves farther from PIRLS 2016 in allowing countries to administer the full PIRLS reading assessment, including both PIRLS Informational and Literary (the previous standard PIRLS assessment), and the ePIRLS Online Informational (the previous ePIRLS), as one seamless digitally based endeavour. Countries may besides select from two levels of the PIRLS cess; providing students with an assessment experience meliorate suited to their reading abilities increases student motivation and provides more accurate cess data. All results will be reported on the aforementioned PIRLS accomplishment scale.

PIRLS 2021 thus offers three flexible options, enabling participants to select the assistants path best suited to assessing their education arrangement:(1) A new fully digital ePIRLS assessment, which integrates all aspects of PIRLS Informational, PIRLS Literary, and the ePIRLS Online Informational assessments; 2) The paper-only version of the PIRLS assessment, which is equivalent to the original pen-and-newspaper PIRLS standard cess; and (iii) The paper-only version of the PIRLS assessment, taken together with the ePIRLS Online Informational assessment.[5]

PIRLS 2016 [edit]

PIRLS 2016 was released on December five, 2017.[6] Information technology likewise collects all-encompassing information about home supports for literacy, curriculum and curriculum implementation, instructional practices, and school resources in each participating state. In this bike at that place were 2 additional initiatives: (1) the PIRLS Literacy assessment (earlier known as prePIRLS) is equivalent to PIRLS in scope and reflects the same formulation of reading as PIRLS. Its purpose is to extend the constructive measurement of reading literacy at the lower end of the achievement calibration. Countries whose fourth-grade students are all the same developing fundamental reading skills can participate in the PIRLS Literacy assessment and still take their results reported on the PIRLS accomplishment calibration. The reading passages and questions in mutual between the PIRLS Literacy and the PIRLS assessments will enable the two assessments to be linked, and their results to be compared. (ii) Initiated in 2016, ePIRLS is a computer-based reading assessment of students' ability to learn and use information when reading online. The cess encompasses an engaging, simulated cyberspace environment with authentic school-similar assignments about scientific discipline and social studies topics. The ePIRLS online reading achievement scale enables countries to examine their fourth-graders' online reading performance relative to their performance on the PIRLS reading accomplishment scales.

In terms of trends, the PIRLS results for student accomplishment by land states that 18 countries had higher average achievement, 13 countries had the same average achievement, and 10 countries had lower average achievement; and girls had college reading achievement than boys in 48 of the 50 countries.[vii] [8]

The 2016 PIRLS Encyclopedia has the Education Policy and Curriculum in Reading by state. It describes the structure of each education system, the reading curricula in the chief grades, and overall policies related to reading instruction.[9]

The ten countries with the highest average reading achievement were: Russian Federation, Singapore, Hong Kong SAR, Ireland, Finland, Poland, Northern Ireland, Norway, Taiwan, and England.[10]

Rank Country Average
scale score
Alter
over 5 years
1 Russia 581 Increase 13 points
2 Singapore 576 Increase 9 points
3 Hong Kong 569 Decrease ii points
4 Ireland 567 Increase xv points
5 Finland 566 Decrease 2 points
6 Poland 565 Increase 39 points
six Northern Ireland 565 Increase 7 points
8 Norway [a] 559 Increase 52 points
8 Chinese Taipei 559 Increase 6 points
viii England 559 Increase seven points
11 Latvia 558 Due north/A
12 Sweden 555 Increase 13 points
xiii Republic of hungary 554 Increase 15 points
14 Bulgaria 552 Increase xx points
fifteen U.s. 549 Decrease 7 points
16 Republic of lithuania 548 Increase 20 points
xvi Italy 548 Increase 7 points
xviii Denmark 547 Decrease vii points
19 Macau 546 N/A
20 Netherlands 545 Decrease one indicate
21 Commonwealth of australia 544 Increase 17 points
22 Czechia 543 Decrease 2 points
22 Canada 543 Decrease 5 points
24 Slovenia 542 Increase 12 points
25 Austria 541 Increase 12 points
26 Frg 537 Decrease iv points
27 Kazakhstan 536 Due north/A
28 Slovakia 535 Steady
29 Israel 530 Decrease eleven points
xxx Portugal 528 Decrease 13 points
30 Espana 528 Increase 15 points
32 Belgium (Flemish) 525 Northward/A
33 New Zealand 523 Decrease 8 points
34 France 511 Decrease 9 points
International average 500 Steady
35 Belgium (French) 497 Decrease nine points
36 Chile 494 North/A
37 Georgia 488 Steady
38 Trinidad and Tobago 479 Increase 8 points
39 Azerbaijan 472 Increase x points
40 Malta 452 Decrease 25 points
41 United Arab Emirates 450 Increase 11 points
42 Bahrain 446 North/A
43 Qatar 442 Increase 17 points
44 Kingdom of saudi arabia 430 Steady
45 Iran 428 Decrease 29 points
46 Oman 418 Increase 27 points
47 Kuwait 393 N/A
48 Morocco 358 Increase 48 points
49 Egypt 330 N/A
50 South Africa 320 N/A
Benchmarking participants
Moscow Moscow (Russia) 612 N/A
Community of Madrid Madrid (Spain) 549 North/A
Quebec Quebec (Canada) 547 Increase ix points
Ontario Ontario (Canada) 544 Decrease viii points
Andalusia Andalusia (Espana) 525 Increase ten points
Norway [b] 517 N/A
Emirate of Dubai Dubai (United Arab Emirates) 515 Increase 39 points
Denmark [c] 501 N/A
Buenos Aires Buenos Aires (Argentina) 480 North/A
Emirate of Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) 414 Decrease x points
South Africa (English/Afrikaans/Zulu)[a] 406 North/A
  1. ^ a b fifth grade students
  2. ^ 4th class students
  3. ^ 3rd course students

Helpful pages [edit]

  • "Listing of reading achievement scores by land - PIRLS 2016".
  • "Trends in reading scores past state - PIRLS 2016".
  • "Links to each country for their instruction system, quaternary form curriculum, etc. - PIRLS 2016".

PIRLS 2011 [edit]

Combining newly developed reading cess passages and questions for 2011 with a selection of secure assessment passages and questions from 2001 and 2006, the study offered a state-of-the-fine art assessment of reading comprehension that allowed for measurement of changes since 2001. The international population for PIRLS 2011 consisted of students in the grade that represents four years of schooling, provided that the mean age at the fourth dimension of testing was at least 9.5 years. In the 2011 cycle, prePIRLS (now known every bit PIRLS Literacy) was offered to assess basic reading skills equally a span to PIRLS, for countries where about children are still developing fundamental reading skills at the end of the master school cycle.[eleven]

Rank State Boilerplate
scale score
Change
over 5 years
1 Hong Kong 571 Increase 7 points
2 Russia 568 Increase 3 points
two Finland 568 North/A
4 Singapore 567 Increase ix points
five Northern Republic of ireland 558 N/A
half dozen The states 556 Increase 16 points
7 Denmark 554 Increase 8 points
8 Croatia 553 N/A
8 Chinese Taipei 553 Increase 18 points
10 Ireland 552 N/A
ten England 552 Increase 13 points
12 Canada 548 N/A
13 Netherlands 546 Decrease 1 point
14 Czech republic 545 N/A
15 Sweden 542 Decrease 7 points
16 Italy 541 Decrease 10 points
16 Germany 541 Decrease 7 points
16 Israel 541 Increase 29 points
xvi Portugal 541 N/A
twenty Hungary 539 Decrease 12 points
21 Slovakia 535 Increase 3 points
22 Bulgaria 532 Decrease 15 points
23 New Zealand 531 Decrease 1 betoken
24 Slovenia 530 Increase 8 points
25 Austria 529 Decrease 9 points
26 Lithuania 528 Decrease 9 points
27 Commonwealth of australia 527 Northward/A
28 Poland 526 Increase 7 points
29 France 520 Decrease 2 points
30 Spain 513 Steady
31 Kingdom of norway 507 Increase 9 points
32 Kingdom of belgium (French) 506 Increase half-dozen points
33 Romania 502 Increase 13 points
International average 500 Steady
34 Georgia 488 Increase 17 points
35 Republic of malta 477 N/A
36 Trinidad and Tobago 471 Increase 35 points
37 Republic of azerbaijan 462 N/A
38 Islamic republic of iran 457 Increase 36 points
39 Colombia 448 N/A
xl United Arab Emirates 439 Due north/A
41 Saudi Arabia 430 N/A
42 Indonesia 428 Increase 23 points
43 Qatar 425 Increase 72 points
44 Oman 391 Northward/A
45 Morocco 310 Decrease 13 points
6th grade participants
Honduras [a] 450 Due north/A
Morocco [a] 424 North/A
Kuwait [a] 419 Due north/A
Botswana [a] 419 North/A
Benchmarking participants
Florida Florida (United states of america) 569 Due north/A
Ontario Ontario (Canada) 552 Decrease 3 points
Alberta Alberta (Canada) 548 Decrease 12 points
Quebec Quebec (Canada) 538 Increase 5 points
Andalusia Andalusia (Espana) 515 N/A
Emirate of Dubai Dubai (United Arab Emirates) 476 Northward/A
Republic of malta (Maltese) 457 Due north/A
Emirate of Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) 424 N/A
South Africa (English/Afrikaans) [b] 421 Northward/A
  1. ^ a b c d 6th grade students
  2. ^ 5th grade students

PIRLS 2006 [edit]

PIRLS 2006 assessed a range of reading comprehension strategies for two major reading purposes: literary and informational. The student test of reading comprehension addressed four processes:

  • retrieval of explicitly stated data
  • making straightforward inferences
  • interpreting and integrating ideas and information
  • exam and evaluation of content, language, and textual elements.

PIRLS 2006 assessed students enrolled in the 4th course.[12]

Rank Country Average
scale score
Change
over 5 years
1 Russia 565 Increase 37 points
2 Hong Kong 564 Increase 36 points
3 Alberta Alberta (Canada) 560 N/A
4 Singapore 558 Increase 30 points
four British Columbia British Columbia (Canada) 558 N/A
half-dozen Grand duchy of luxembourg 557 North/A
7 Ontario Ontario (Canada) 555 N/A
8 Italia 551 Increase 10 points
8 Republic of hungary 551 Northward/A
10 Sweden 549 Decrease 12 points
eleven Germany 548 Increase 9 points
12 Netherlands 547 Decrease 7 points
12 Belgium (Flemish) 547 Due north/A
12 Bulgaria 547 Decrease 3 points
15 Denmark 546 N/A
16 Nova Scotia Nova Scotia (Canada) 542 N/A
17 Latvia 541 Decrease 4 points
eighteen United States 540 Decrease two points
19 England 539 Decrease 14 points
20 Austria 538 Due north/A
21 Lithuania 537 Decrease 6 points
22 Chinese Taipei 535 North/A
23 Quebec Quebec (Canada) 533 N/A
24 New Zealand 532 Increase 3 points
24 Slovakia 532 Increase 15 points
26 Scotland 527 Decrease 1 point
27 French republic 522 Decrease 3 points
27 Slovenia 522 Increase 20 points
29 Poland 519 N/A
30 Spain 513 N/A
31 Israel 512 Increase iii points
32 Iceland 511 Decrease ane indicate
International average 500 Steady
33 Moldova 500 Increase 8 points
33 Kingdom of belgium (French) 500 Northward/A
35 Kingdom of norway 498 Decrease 1 point
36 Romania 489 Decrease 23 points
37 Georgia 471 N/A
38 Republic of macedonia 442 Steady
39 Trinidad and Tobago 436 N/A
40 Iran 421 Due north/A
41 Indonesia 405 N/A
42 Qatar 353 N/A
43 State of kuwait 330 Decrease 66 points
44 Morocco 323 Decrease 27 points
45 South Africa 302 N/A

PIRLS 2001 [edit]

The IEA Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2001 was the first cycle of assessments to measure trends in children'south reading literacy achievement, and policy and practices related to literacy. The written report examined three aspects of reading literacy: processes of comprehension, purposes for reading, and reading literacy behavior and attitudes. 35 countries took role in the showtime cycle where students enrolled in the fourth class were assessed.[13]

Rank Country Average
calibration score
ane Sweden 561
ii Netherlands 554
3 England 553
4 Republic of bulgaria 550
v Latvia 545
vi Canada [a] 544
7 Lithuania 543
seven Hungary 543
9 Usa 542
10 Italy 541
11 Federal republic of germany 539
12 Czech republic 537
13 New Zealand 529
14 Scotland 528
14 Singapore 528
fourteen Russia 528
14 Hong Kong 528
xviii France 525
19 Greece 524
twenty Slovakia 518
21 Republic of iceland 512
21 Romania 512
23 Israel 509
24 Slovenia 502
International average 500
25 Norway 499
26 Cyprus 494
27 Moldova 492
28 Turkey 449
29 Macedonia 442
30 Colombia 422
31 Argentina 420
32 Islamic republic of iran 414
33 Kuwait 396
34 Morocco 350
35 Belize 327
  1. ^ Represented by Ontario (548) and Quebec (487)

United states results by race and ethnicity [edit]

Race 2016[xiv] 2011[15] 2006[16] 2001[17]
Score Score Score Score
Asian 591 588 567 551
Multiracial 578
White 571 575 560 565
United states Average 549 556 540 542
Other 545 573
Hispanic 525 532 518 517
Black 518 522 503 502
American Indian/Alaska Native 468

PIRLS assessment [edit]

The PIRLS study consists of a chief survey that consists of a written reading comprehension test and a background questionnaire. The PIRLS Reading Evolution Group (RDG) and National Research Coordinators (NRCs) from the participating countries collaborate to develop the reading assessments. The cess focuses on three main areas of literacy: process of comprehension, purposes for reading, and reading behaviors and attitudes. The background questionnaire is used to determine the reading behaviors and attitudes. The written test is designed to address the process of comprehension and the purposes for reading. There are two purposes for reading that are examined in this study: reading for literary experience and reading to larn and use information. Each pupil receives fourscore minutes to consummate ii passages and then fourth dimension to complete the survey. At that place are a total of 8 passage. 4 passages are for each purpose of reading. "With eight reading passages in total, merely just two to be given to any one student, passages and their accompanying items were assigned to student exam booklets according to a matrix sampling programme. The eight passages were distributed beyond 10 booklets, two per booklet, so that passages were paired together in a booklet in equally many different ways every bit possible."[2] The PIRLS target population is the form that represents four years of schooling, counting from the first year of ISCED Level i, which corresponds to the fourth grade in most countries. To better match the assessment to the achievement level of students, countries accept the pick of administering PIRLS or PIRLS Literacy at the fifth or sixth grade.

Groundwork questionnaire [edit]

Given to:

  • Home/parents—This questionnaire includes questions well-nigh "students' early reading experiences, child-parent literacy interactions, parents' reading habits and attitudes, home-school connections, and demographic and socioeconomic indicators."
  • Students—This questionnaire includes questions about "instructional experiences, self-perception and attitudes towards reading, out-of-school reading habits, reckoner use, home literacy resources, and basic demographic data."
  • Teachers—This questionnaire includes questions about "characteristics of the class tested, instructional activities for teaching reading, classroom resources, assessment practices, and about their education, training, and opportunities for professional development."
  • Schools—This questionnaire includes questions nearly "enrollment and schoolhouse characteristics, school system for reading instruction, school staffing and resource, dwelling house-schoolhouse connections, and the school environment."[2]

Participating organizations [edit]

  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement|IEA]] with offices in Amsterdam and Hamburg
  • International Study Centre (ISC) at Boston College
  • Statistics Canada
  • Educational Testing Services in Princeton, NJ
  • National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales (NFER) in the Great britain
  • Reading Evolution Group (RDG)

Participating countries [edit]

Land Years
Argentine republic 2001, 2016[a]
Australia 2011, 2016
Austria 2006, 2011, 2016
Azerbaijan 2011, 2016
Bahrain 2016
Belize 2001
Belgium 2006,[b] 2011,[c] 2016[b]
Botswana 2011[d]
Republic of bulgaria 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Canada 2001,[e] 2006,[f] 2011, 2016
Chile 2016
Chinese Taipei 2006, 2011, 2016
Republic of colombia 2001, 2011
Croatia 2011
Cyprus 2006
Czech Republic 2001, 2011, 2016
Denmark 2006, 2011, 2016
Egypt 2016
England 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Finland 2011, 2016
French republic 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Georgia 2006, 2011, 2016
Deutschland 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Hellenic republic 2001
Honduras 2011[d]
Hong Kong 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Hungary 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Iceland 2001, 2006
Indonesia 2006, 2011
Iran 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Ireland 2011, 2016
Israel 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Italy 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Kazakhstan 2016
State of kuwait 2001, 2006, 2011,[d] 2016
Latvia 2001, 2006, 2016
Lithuania 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Macau 2016
Republic of macedonia 2001, 2006
Republic of malta 2011, 2016
Moldova 2001, 2006
Morocco 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Netherlands 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
New Zealand 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Northern Ireland 2011, 2016
Norway 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Oman 2011, 2016
Portugal 2011, 2016
Qatar 2006, 2011, 2016
Romania 2001, 2006, 2011
Russia 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Kingdom of saudi arabia 2011, 2016
Scotland 2001, 2006
Singapore 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Slovakia 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Slovenia 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
South Africa 2006, 2011,[1000] 2016
Spain 2006, 2011, 2016
Sweden 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
Trinidad and Tobago 2006, 2011, 2016
Turkey 2001
United Arab Emirates 2011, 2016
United States 2001, 2006, 2011, 2016
  1. ^ as Buenos Aires (benchmarking only)
  2. ^ a b French and Flemish separated
  3. ^ French only
  4. ^ a b c 6th grade merely
  5. ^ represented by Ontario and Quebec
  6. ^ as Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Quebec
  7. ^ English language/Afrikaans (benchmarking only)

Come across also [edit]

  • International Clan for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
  • Plan for International Student Assessment (PISA), an educational ranking amongst OECD nations
  • Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)

Future studies [edit]

PIRLS 2016[1] is the quaternary assessment in the current trend serial, post-obit PIRLS 2001, 2006, and 2011. Participating countries include: Argentina (Buenos Aires), Commonwealth of australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Kingdom of belgium (Flemish), Belgium (French), Botswana, Bulgaria, Canada (with Ontario and Quebec as benchmarking systems), Republic of chile, Taiwan, Czech Democracy, Denmark, Egypt, England, Finland, France, Georgia, Frg, Hong Kong SAR, Hungary, Islamic republic of iran, Ireland, State of israel, Italy, Jordan, Kazakhstan, State of kuwait, Republic of lithuania, Republic of malta, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, Norway, Oman, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saudi arabia, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain (with Andalusia equally a benchmarking system), Sweden, Trinidad and Tobago, United Arab Emirates (with Abu Dhabi and Dubai every bit benchmarking systems), and U.s.. All of the countries, institutions, and agencies involved in successive PIRLS assessments have worked collaboratively in edifice the well-nigh comprehensive and innovative measure of reading comprehension possible, first in 2001 and improving with each bike since then. PIRLS is directed by the TIMSS & PIRLS International Report Center at Boston Higher.[18]

PIRLS 2021[19] will be the fifth assessment, marker 20 years of trends. Country enrollment opened in 2017.

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c d "PIRLS. Progress in International Reading Literacy Study - IEA". www.iea.nl. Archived from the original on 2016-11-21. Retrieved 2016-11-21 .
  2. ^ a b c "PIRLS 2001 International Written report, Appendix A" (PDF) . Retrieved 2018-08-10 .
  3. ^ "Monitoring Trends in Reading Literacy Achievement, 2016 PIRLS".
  4. ^ "Other IEA studies - IEA". www.iea.nl.
  5. ^ "Info" (PDF). www.iea.nl.
  6. ^ "PIRLS 2016".
  7. ^ "PIRLS 2016 International results in reading".
  8. ^ "Trends in reading results by country".
  9. ^ "2016 PIRLS Encyclopedia".
  10. ^ "PIRLS 2016 Pupil Achievement Overview".
  11. ^ "PIRLS 2011 International Study, Affiliate 1" (PDF). timssandpirls.bc.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 13 Dec 2021.
  12. ^ "PIRLS 2006 International Report, Chapter 1" (PDF). timssandpirls.bc.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 March 2016. Retrieved 13 Dec 2021.
  13. ^ "PIRLS 2001 International Report, Chapter 1" (PDF). timssandpirls.bc.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 May 2019. Retrieved xiii December 2021.
  14. ^ "Reading Achievement of U.Southward. Fourth-Form Students in an International Context" (PDF). {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  15. ^ "PROGRESS IN INTERNATIONAL READING LITERACY STUDY (PIRLS)". {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  16. ^ "The Reading Literacy of U.S. Fourth-Course Students in an International Context" (PDF). {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  17. ^ "International Comparisons in Fourth-Class Reading Literacy" (PDF). {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  18. ^ "Intro" (PDF). timssandpirls.bc.edu. 2016.
  19. ^ "PIRLS - Next Cycle - IEA". www.iea.nl.

External links [edit]

  • http://www.iea.nl/pirls-progress-international-reading-literacy-study
  • http://www.pirls.org/
  • http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pirls/
  • http://timss.bc.edu/pirls2001.html
  • http://www.nfer.ac.britain/publications/other-publications/downloadable-reports/reading-all-over-the-world-progress-in-international-reading-literacy-report.cfm
  • http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/
  • http://pirls2016.org/pirls/summary/ PIRLS Summary
  • U.Southward. PIRLS and ePIRLS 2016 Technical Study and User'south Guide, JULY 2019

Further reading [edit]

  • "Where the globe's quaternary-graders read at the most avant-garde level, Dec 2017".
  • "British Educational Inquiry Periodical; Measuring Standards in Primary English: The Validity of Pirls: A Response to Mary Hilton; Chris Whetton, Liz Twist and Marian Sainsbury; 2007". JSTOR 30032803.
  • "The limits of educational data; David Buckingham".

The Pirls Is the Main International Test of Reading Given to Students.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progress_in_International_Reading_Literacy_Study

0 Response to "The Pirls Is the Main International Test of Reading Given to Students."

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel